Transparency
Network statistics.
A full breakdown of what this network has enforced — accounts banned and communities flagged — in which categories, and how often it has reversed itself. Published openly because a shared ban list that can't be audited is just a rumour with a database behind it.
Accounts
3
Cases on record
2
Currently banned
1
Bans reversed
0
Under appeal
2
Servers protected
3
Cases opened, last 30 days
No prior period to compare against yet
33.3%
Of all cases have been reversed
We publish this because getting it wrong is possible
—
Of decided appeals were upheld
0 approved · 0 denied · 1 waiting
2
Active bans that are permanent
The rest expire on their own
Communities
1
Communities on record
1
Currently flagged
0
Cleared after review
0
Where members were banned
0
Accounts banned that way
0%
Of listings have been cleared
Published for the same reason as the ban reversal rate
0%
Of listings led to a whole-server ban
Membership alone is usually not a ban — this is the exception
0%
Of all cases came from a server sweep
Each one is still an individual, appealable case
1
Categories in use for communities
Different from ban categories — a server can't be a "hacked account"
By category
Why communities get flagged
By category
What people are banned for
Over time
Cases opened, last 30 days
5 Aug
Hover any bar for the exact day
Today
Methodology
How to read this page
What's counted
Every case, including reversed ones
- Cases on record is every case ever opened. Unbanning changes a case's status, it never removes it — so this number only goes up.
- Currently banned counts cases in the active state right now, which is the figure that actually reflects who is being kept out today.
- A mass ban creates one case per account, so twenty alts show as twenty cases — not one. The same is true of a whole-server ban: it appears here as however many people it banned, not as one action.
- Communities are counted separately from accounts. Flagging a server is not a ban and adds nothing to the account figures; only an actual sweep does.
What isn't here
Nothing that identifies anyone
- No user IDs, usernames, reasons or evidence. Those live on the public lookup, one ID at a time, deliberately.
- No server names, and no per-server figures — a breakdown by community would just be a scoreboard.
- Never who reported someone. Not in aggregate, not anywhere.
Caveats
What these numbers aren't
- They measure our moderation decisions — not how much of anything is happening on Discord.
- A low count in a category can mean it's rare, or that we're not the ones catching it.
- Figures are computed live at page load, so two people loading it seconds apart can see different totals.
- The community figures cover servers we reviewed. There is no way to know what share of bad servers that is, and we don't imply one.
Think a number here is wrong, or want a breakdown that isn't published? safety@mrbridy.net.